<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>All_about_network</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kuncar.net/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kuncar.net/blog</link>
	<description>Signalmen of all countries solder up!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:57:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>QoS on Huawei equipment &#8211; Custom Queunig</title>
		<link>http://www.kuncar.net/blog/qos-on-huawei-equipment-custom-queunig/2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kuncar.net/blog/qos-on-huawei-equipment-custom-queunig/2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 07:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tnk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Huawei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QoS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar-46]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classyfing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cusom Queuing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scheduling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vrp 3.40]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kuncar.net/blog/?p=443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ After some time I have finally some energy to publish a bit more of some stuff about Huawei QoS. The following article will be concentrating on Custom Queuing as it is seen on VRP 3.40 on AR series routers (namely AR46 and AR28).
The first important thing to know is what the Custom Queuing actually [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kuncar.net/blog/qos-on-huawei-equipment-custom-queunig/2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Notes on Nokia boxes with IPSO 4.X</title>
		<link>http://www.kuncar.net/blog/notes-on-nokia-boxes-with-ipso-4-x/2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kuncar.net/blog/notes-on-nokia-boxes-with-ipso-4-x/2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tnk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Checkpoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPSO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nokia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipso 4.2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kuncar.net/blog/?p=440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
This article will be rather short as it will contain just few bits an pieces of what I encountered while doing some stuff on Nokia boxes.
1. How to  bring up an unconfigured interface
step 1 &#8211; run CLISH
step 2 &#8211; run show interafaces
step 3 &#8211; find the interface you want to configure and note that the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kuncar.net/blog/notes-on-nokia-boxes-with-ipso-4-x/2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Routing on Nokia IPSO and Secure Platform (SPLAT)</title>
		<link>http://www.kuncar.net/blog/routing-on-nokia-ipso-and-secure-platform-splat/2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kuncar.net/blog/routing-on-nokia-ipso-and-secure-platform-splat/2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tnk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Checkpoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R65]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nokia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[routing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secure platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[splat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ip390]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipso 4.2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kuncar.net/blog/?p=394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
As I am involved with security appliances lately I thought It would be beneficial if I write down some stuff about them. This time it will be &#8220;howto&#8221;  on routing on the Nokia IP390 appliance with IPSO 4.2 and SPLAT supplied with Check Point R65. In this article will be described some basics about routing [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kuncar.net/blog/routing-on-nokia-ipso-and-secure-platform-splat/2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>QoS operation on AR28 and AR46 with VRP 3.40</title>
		<link>http://www.kuncar.net/blog/qos-operation-on-ar28-and-ar46-with-vrp-3-40/2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kuncar.net/blog/qos-operation-on-ar28-and-ar46-with-vrp-3-40/2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tnk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Huawei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QoS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classyfing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vrp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vrp 3.40]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kuncar.net/blog/?p=312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ As one of the previous posts was about configuration of AR46 and 28 series routers this one will be kind of a follow-up article about the QoS on these devices or rather some real example.
But as usually first things first &#8211; the dry theory of QoS.  As you probably know QoS is abbreviation for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kuncar.net/blog/qos-operation-on-ar28-and-ar46-with-vrp-3-40/2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IPSec general principles overwiev</title>
		<link>http://www.kuncar.net/blog/ipsec-general-principles-overwiev/2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kuncar.net/blog/ipsec-general-principles-overwiev/2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tnk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPSec]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kuncar.net/blog/?p=336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi this article is an output of my long &#8211; term digging around security stuff (and by that I mean especially a lot of IPSec things). After months I kept returning for some resources I cannot find anymore I decided to write quick but (hopefully) comprehensive overview of this technology and most if the things [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kuncar.net/blog/ipsec-general-principles-overwiev/2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News and plans</title>
		<link>http://www.kuncar.net/blog/news-and-plans/2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kuncar.net/blog/news-and-plans/2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 13:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tnk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kuncar.net/blog/?p=318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello everyone,
as you can see I did not post for almost a month which is caused by me being in a new job at computerlinks. As I was not involved with firewalls before (at least not with the type I work with now) there is quite some load of stuff I need to grasp.
So what [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kuncar.net/blog/news-and-plans/2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Frame-relay multilink and VRF on AR46 platform with VRP 3.40</title>
		<link>http://www.kuncar.net/blog/frame-relay-multilink-and-vrf-on-ar46-platform-with-vrp-340/2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kuncar.net/blog/frame-relay-multilink-and-vrf-on-ar46-platform-with-vrp-340/2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 23:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tnk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Huawei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ar-46]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frame relay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multilink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vrf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vrp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vrp 3.40]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vrrp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kuncar.net/blog/?p=58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So time had come to (finally) leave the IPSec and move on to some other stuff. This scenario will show how to configure Frame Relay multilink, some QoS and all of that in combination with VRF and VRRP technology. As this topic is rather more extensive than the previous ones it will be divided into [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kuncar.net/blog/frame-relay-multilink-and-vrf-on-ar46-platform-with-vrp-340/2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>l2tp over IPSec scenario</title>
		<link>http://www.kuncar.net/blog/l2tp-over-ipsec-scenario/2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kuncar.net/blog/l2tp-over-ipsec-scenario/2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 23:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tnk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Huawei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPSec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[L2tp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vrp 3.40]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kuncar.net/blog/?p=77</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So this is the long promised scenario that can be used with windows XP (even though it is not really user friendly).
If you need a &#8220;PC-client &#8211; VPN-concentrator&#8221; scenario. Huawei does offer only one-way ticket for you and it is l2tp over IPSec. Unless you want to use some MPLS over IPSec which is in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kuncar.net/blog/l2tp-over-ipsec-scenario/2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FireHOL</title>
		<link>http://www.kuncar.net/blog/firehol/2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kuncar.net/blog/firehol/2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 15:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tnk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firehol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firewall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iptables]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kuncar.net/blog/?p=175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-167" title="tux" src="http://www.kuncar.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/tux-150x150.png" alt="tux" width="120" height="120" />Firehol is an nice and easy overlay for IPtables - which means it will allow you to manage IPtables without going really learn their syntax by providing simple config file and few scripts that will do the work for you.

For better description see the <a title="FireHOL" href="http://firehol.sourceforge.net/" target="_blank">FireHOL's  homepage</a>. As this is not a firewall in the real meaning of the]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kuncar.net/blog/firehol/2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Port isolate vs. Mac Forced Forwarding</title>
		<link>http://www.kuncar.net/blog/mac-forced-forwarding/2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kuncar.net/blog/mac-forced-forwarding/2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 16:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tnk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Huawei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac-forced-forwarding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[port isolate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S3900]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S5600]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S6500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VRP 3.10]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kuncar.net/blog/?p=211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-118" title="Huawei Logo" src="http://www.kuncar.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/huawei_logo_001-150x150.jpg" alt="Huawei Logo" width="120" height="120" />Let me first say that these two features are supposed to do very similar things - they are designed to separate access users so their traffic cannot go directly between them without any control. This is a must as most of the attacks are actually executed from inside your own network and specifically in the same subnet where the]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kuncar.net/blog/mac-forced-forwarding/2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
