<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>All_about_network &#187; L2tp</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kuncar.net/blog/tag/l2tp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kuncar.net/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 23:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>l2tp over IPSec scenario</title>
		<link>http://www.kuncar.net/blog/l2tp-over-ipsec-scenario/2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kuncar.net/blog/l2tp-over-ipsec-scenario/2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 23:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tnk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Huawei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPSec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[L2tp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vrp 3.40]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kuncar.net/blog/?p=77</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So this is the long promised scenario that can be used with windows XP (even though it is not really user friendly). If you need a &#8220;PC-client &#8211; VPN-concentrator&#8221; scenario. Huawei does offer only one-way ticket for you and it is l2tp over IPSec. Unless you want to use some MPLS over IPSec which is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kuncar.net/blog/l2tp-over-ipsec-scenario/2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IPSec troubles Part II</title>
		<link>http://www.kuncar.net/blog/ipsec-troubles-part-ii/2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kuncar.net/blog/ipsec-troubles-part-ii/2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 20:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tnk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Huawei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPSec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[L2tp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VPN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kuncar.net/blog/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-118" title="Huawei Logo" src="http://www.kuncar.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/huawei_logo_001-150x150.jpg" alt="Huawei Logo" width="120" height="120" />Ok so from the previous post is clear how to make one tunnel using IPSec, IKE and isakmp.

So what if the situation is that you need multiple tunnels on one ip interface.

There is a limitation of one IPSec policy being applied on particular interface at one time so it is impossible to use more various policies. But there is a workaround -]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kuncar.net/blog/ipsec-troubles-part-ii/2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

